Midrash su II Samuele 21:32

(Deut. 21:10:) WHEN YOU GO OUT TO WAR <AGAINST YOUR ENEMIES, AND THE LORD YOUR GOD GIVES THEM INTO YOUR HAND> AND YOU TAKE THEM CAPTIVE. Our masters have taught (Avot 4:2): <ONE> GOOD DEED BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> GOOD DEED, AND <ONE> TRANSGRESSION BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> TRANSGRESSION. (Deut. 21:11–12:) AND WHEN YOU SEE AMONG THE CAPTIVES A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN <WHOM YOU DESIRE TO TAKE FOR A WIFE, YOU SHALL BRING HER INTO YOUR HOUSE, > WHERE SHE SHALL SHAVE HER HEAD, so that she will not find favor in his eyes.¹Tanh., Deut. 6:1; see Deut. R. 6:4. What is written after that (in vs. 15):) WHEN A MAN HAS TWO WIVES. Two wives in <one> house <means> strife in the house. And moreover (ibid., cont.:) ONE LOVED AND THE OTHER HATED, or both of them hated. What is written after that (in vs. 18)? IF ONE HAS A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. Whenever anyone marries a pretty face, there results from it A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. Thus we find it so in the case of David, because (as suggested by II Sam. 3:3) he had lusted for Maacah bat Talmai king of Geshur, while he had gone to war.²By having sexual relations while at war with Saul (II Sam. 3:1), David was disobeying the Mosaic law of warfare. See Deut. 20:7–8. So Absalom came out of him <in this union>, who wanted to kill him and (according to II Sam. 16:22) slept with his wives before the eyes of all Israel and in broad daylight. Also because of him several myriads from Israel were killed. So he made discord in Israel. Also killed were Shimei [ben Gera] (in I Kings 2:46), Sheba ben Bichri (in II Sam. 20:22), Ahithophel (in II Sam. 17:23), Mephibosheth,³There seems to be some confusion between Mephibosheth who was a son of Saul that David had killed (in II Sam. 21:8) and the Mephibosheth who was Saul’s grandson and who was falsely accused of betraying David for Absalom (II Sam. 16:3; but cf. 19:24–30). and Ishbosheth (in II Sam. 4:7). Moreover <David> had Ziba rule over the whole house of Saul (II Sam. 16:4; cf. II Sam. 9:9). It is also taught: R. Jose says:⁴Sanh. 72a. Is it because A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON ate half a pound⁵Gk.: litra. of meat and drank half a log of wine that Torah says for one to go out to the place for <execution by> stoning (cf. Deut. 21:18–21)? It is simply that Torah has foreseen the end of A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON, that he ends up squandering his father's assets with wastrels with whom he eats and drinks, until he seeks what he has been accustomed to and does not find it.⁶Cf. Luke 15:14–16. Then he goes out to the crossroads, where he kills people and robs⁷Melastem, from the Gk.: lestes (“robber”). them. So Torah is saying: Let him die innocent and not die guilty, for the death of the wicked is fitting for them and fitting for the world. And what is written after that (in vs. 22)? AND WHEN SOMEONE IS GUILTY OF A CRIME PUNISHABLE BY DEATH AND IS PUT TO DEATH. If he is delivered from the one,⁸I.e., the preventive punishment as A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. he is not delivered from the other. We have learned (in Avot 4:2): THAT <ONE> TRANSGRESSION BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> TRANSGRESSION; <ONE> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT.⁹In the text of Avot the clauses are reversed. For the correct order, see the beginning of the paragraph. Note also that the word for GOOD DEED (mitswah) also means COMMANDMENT and that the midrash has both meanings in mind. Where is it shown (in Scripture)? Where it is stated (in Deut. 22:6–7): WHEN YOU COME ACROSS A BIRD NEST…. YOU MUST SURELY LET <THE MOTHER> GO …, IN ORDER THAT IT MAY BE WELL WITH YOU AND YOU MAY LENGTHEN YOUR LIFE. What is written after that (in vs. 8)? [WHEN YOU BUILD A NEW HOUSE, <YOU SHALL MAKE A PARAPET FOR YOUR ROOF>.] You have the right to build a house and make a parapet. What is written after that (in vs. 9)? YOU SHALL NOT SOW YOUR VINEYARD WITH TWO KINDS OF SEED. You do have a right to <possess> a vineyard and to sow a field. What is written after that (in vs. 10)? YOU SHALL NOT PLOW WITH AN OX AND AN ASS <TOGETHER>. You do have a right to <possess> oxen and asses. What is written after that (in vs. 11)? YOU SHALL NOT WEAR INTERWOVEN STUFF, <WOOL AND FLAX TOGETHER>. You do have the right to nice clothes of wool and of linen (but not in combination). What is written after that (in vs. 12)? YOU SHALL MAKE YOURSELVES TASSELS. You have a right to the commandment on tassels. What is written after that (in vs. 13)? WHEN A MAN TAKES A WIFE. A man has a right to a wife and children. We learn (in Avot 4:2): THAT <ONE> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT BRINGS ABOUT <ANOTHER> GOOD DEED/COMMANDMENT; therefore the parashot are dependent on each other.

(Deut. 21:10:) “When you go out to war [against your enemies, and the Lord your God gives them into your hand and you take them captive].” Our masters have taught (Avot 4:2), “[One] good deed/commandment brings about [another] good deed/commandment, and [one] transgression brings about [another] transgression.” (Deut. 21:11-12:) “And when you see among the captives a woman of pretty form [whom you desire to take for a wife. And you shall bring her into your house,] where she shall shave her head and do her nails,” so that she will not find favor in his eyes.¹See Deut. R. 6:4. What is written after that (in vs. 15), “When a man has two wives.” Two [wives] in [one] house [means] strife in the house. And moreover (ibid., cont.) “one loved and the other hated,” or both of them hated. What is written after that (in vs. 18)? “If one has a defiant and rebellious son.” Whenever anyone marries a “woman of pretty form,” there results from it a defiant and rebellious son. Thus we find it so in the case of David, because (as suggested by II Sam. 3:3) he had desired Maacah bat Talmai king of Geshur, while he had gone to war; so Absalom came out of him [in this union. The latter] wanted to kill him and (according to II Sam. 16:22) slept with his ten concubines before the eyes of all Israel and in broad daylight. Also because of him several myriads from Israel were killed. And he created discord in Israel, [through which] were killed Shimei ben Gera (in I Kings 2:46), Sheba ben Bichri (in II Sam. 20:22), Ahithophel (in II Sam. 17:23). And he killed Mephibosheth,²There may be some confusion between Mephibosheth who was a son of Saul that David had killed (in II Sam. 21:8) and the Mephibosheth who was Saul’s grandson and who was falsely accused of betraying David for Absalom (II Sam. 16:3; but cf. 19:24–30). and had Ziba rule over the whole house of Saul (II Sam. 16:4; cf. II Sam. 9:9). It is taught: R. Jose says,³Sanh. 72a. “Is it because a defiant and rebellious son ate half a pound⁴Gk.: litra. of meat and drank half a log of undiluted wine that the Torah says for him to go out to the court and be [executed by] stoning (cf. Deut. 21:18-21)? It is simply that Torah has foreseen the end of the thinking of a defiant and rebellious son. As in the end he will squander his father's assets with wastrels with whom he eats and drinks, until he seeks what he has been accustomed to and does not find it. Then he goes out to the crossroads, where he kills people and robs⁵Melastem, from the Gk.: lestes (“robber”). them. So the Torah is saying, ‘Let him die innocent and not die guilty,’ for the death of the wicked benefits them and benefits the world.” And what is written after that (in vs. 22)? “And when someone is guilty of a crime punishable by death and is put to death.” If he is delivered from the one,⁶I.e., the preventive punishment as A DEFIANT AND REBELLIOUS SON. he is not delivered from the other. [Hence] we have learned “[One] transgression brings about [another] transgression.” [But that one] good deed/commandment brings about [another] good deed/commandment,⁷In the text of Avot the clauses are reversed. For the correct order, see the beginning of the paragraph. Note also that the word for GOOD DEED (mitswah) also means COMMANDMENT and that the midrash has both meanings in mind. where is it shown (in Scripture)? Where it is stated (in Deut. 22:6-7), “When you come across a bird nest…. You must surely let [the mother] go …, in order that it may be well with you and you may lengthen your life.” What is written after that (in vs. 8)? “When you build a new house, [you shall make a parapet for your roof].]” You will merit to build a house and make a parapet. What is written after that (in vs. 9)? “You shall not sow your vineyard with two kinds of seed.” You will merit to [possess] a vineyard and to sow a field. What is written after that (in vs. 10)? “You shall not plow with an ox and an ass [together].” You will merit to [possess] oxen and asses. What is written after that (in vs. 11)? “You shall not wear interwoven stuff, [wool and flax together].” You will merit to [possess] nice clothes of wool and of linen. What is written after that (in vs. 12)? “You shall make yourselves tassels.” You shall merit the commandment of tassels. What is written after that (in vs. 13)? “When a man takes a wife.” You shsll merit to [have] a wife and children. Behold, we have learned that [one] good deed/commandment brings about [another] good deed/commandment and one] transgression brings about [another] transgression. Therefore these sections of the Torah are adjacent to one another.

“There was a famine in the land.” Ten famines came to the world. One during the days of Adam; one during the days of Lemekh; one during the days of Abraham; one during the days of Isaac; one during the days of Jacob; one during the days of Elijah; one during the days of Elisha; one during the days of David; one during the days when the judges judged; and one that is yet progressing and coming to the world.
One during the days of Adam, as it is stated: “Accursed is the ground because of you” (Genesis 3:17); one during the days of Lemekh, as it is stated: “From the ground that the Lord had cursed” (Genesis 5:29); one during the days of Abraham, as it is stated: “There was famine in the land and Abram descended to Egypt” (Genesis 12:10); one during the days of Isaac: “There was a famine in the land, beside the first famine” (Genesis 26:1); one during the days of Jacob, as it is stated: “For these two years there has been famine in the land” (Genesis 45:6); one during the days of Elijah, as it is stated: “There will not be dew or rain these years, except by my word” (I Kings 17:1); one during the days of Elisha, as it is stated: “There was a great famine in Samaria” (II Kings 6:25); one during the days of David, as it is stated: “There was a famine during the days of David, three years” (II Samuel 21:1); one during the days when the judges judged, as it is stated: “There was a famine in the land” (Ruth 1:1); and one that is advancing upon the world, as it is written: “I will send famine in the land, not famine for bread, not thirst for water” (Amos 8:11).
Rabbi Huna in the name of Rabbi Shmuel: It would have been appropriate for the main manifestation of them³⁹The years of famine during the days of David. to have been during the days of Saul, and it was not appropriate for them to have been during the days of David. [But] because Saul was an offshoot of a sycamore tree,⁴⁰The sycamore tree is frail. and would have been unable to withstand it, the Holy One blessed be He transferred it and brought it to David, who is the offshoot of an olive tree⁴¹The olive tree is sturdy. and [he] was able to withstand it. A parable says: Shila sinned and Yoḥana⁴²Generic names of that period. pays for it? So, all of them did not come upon lowly people, but rather upon mighty people who could withstand them. Rabbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar: [It is analogous] to a glazier who had a basket filled with cups of cut glass. When he sought to hang his basket, he would bring a peg, hammer it [into the wall,] and then hang his basket. So, all of them did not come upon lowly people, but rather to mighty people. Rabbi Berekhya would read in reference to them:⁴³David’s generation. “He gives strength to the weary” (Isaiah 40:29).
Rabbi Berekhya in the name of Rabbi Ḥelbo: Two [famines]⁴⁴That of Lemekh occurred while Adam was still alive. came during the days of Adam.⁴⁵In the parallel text of this midrash found in Bereishit Rabba 25:3 it says ‘Abraham’ instead of ‘Adam.’ Rav Huna in the name of Rav Aḥa: One was during the days of Abraham, and one was during the days of Lemekh. The famine that was during the days of Elijah was due to a drought. One year it produced [a harvest] and the other year it did not produce. But the famine during the days of Elisha was due to [economic] panic, as it is stated: “Until a donkey’s head was sold for eighty of silver” (II Kings 6:25). [Regarding] the famine that came during the days that the judges judged, Rabbi Huna in the name of Rabbi Dosa: They were forty-two se’a⁴⁶A measure of dry volume roughly equivalent to 8 liters. and they became forty-one se’a.⁴⁷The reference is to the amount of produce that could be purchased for one sela. Some commentators suggest that the text should be read: they were [sold] at a rate of two se’a [per sela] and became one se’a [per sela]. See Etz Yosef. But is it not taught: A person may not depart to outside the Land of Israel until two se’a⁴⁸Of wheat. are bought for a shekel?⁴⁹The reference is to the biblical shekel, which is the equivalent of the rabbinic sela. Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel said: When is that so? It is when one cannot find anything [else] to buy. But if he can find [other food] to buy, even [at] one se’a for a shekel, a Jew may not leave the Land of Israel.⁵⁰Elimelekh was punished because his decision to leave the Land of Israel was not justified. But is it not taught: During a time of pestilence, a time of war, gather everyone inside, but during a time of famine, scatter? Why was Elimelekh punished? It is because he sank the hearts of Israel.
[It is analogous] to a prominent person who lived in a province, and the residents of the province would depend upon him, and would say that if drought years would come, he could provide food for the province for ten years. When a drought year came, his maidservant went out, and went into the market with her basket in her hand. The residents of the province said: This is the one who we relied upon, that if there would be a drought he could support us for ten years? His maidservant is standing in the market with her basket in her hand! So, Elimelekh was one of the prominent residents of the province, and one of the leaders of the generation. When the years of famine arrived, he said: ‘Now, all Israel will come around to my door, this one with his basket and that one with his basket.’ He arose and fled from them; that is what is written: “A man of Bethlehem of Judah went.”

(Fol. 12b) Rabba b. Chinena, the Senior, in the name of Rab, said further: "Whoever is able to pray for mercy on behalf of his friend and does not pray, is to be called a sinner; as it is said (I Sam. 12, 23.) Moreover as for me, far be it from me that I should sin against the Lord by ceasing to pray in your behalf." Raba said: "If he who is the sick be a great man, his friend should pray for him until he himself is worn out." What is the reason? Shall we say because it is written (Ib. 22, 8.) And there is none who sickens for me nor informeth me? Perhaps this refers only to a King? But we learn it from this, (Ps. 35, 13.) But as for me, when they were sick, my clothing was sackcloth. Further said Rabba b. Chinena, the Senior, in the name of Rab: "He, who after committing a transgression, feels ashamed, will be forgiven of all his sins, as it is said (Ez. 16, 63.) In order that thou mayest remember, and feel ashamed and never open thy mouth any more because of thy shame. When I forgive thee for all that thou hast done saith the Lord God." Perhaps a community [to which that refers] is different? But we learn from this, (I Sam. 28. 15.) And Samuel said unto Saul, Why hast thou disquieted me? And Saul answered, I am greatly distressed for the Philistines make war against me, and God has departed from me and hath not answered me any more, neither by the agency of the prophets, nor by means of dreams: therefore I have called thee, that thou mayest make known unto me what I shall do. And he fails to mention the Urim and Tummim; he was ashamed to mention these because he killed all the priests of Nob who performed that rite. And whence do we learn that his sins were forgiven by Heaven? It is said (Ib.) And Samuel said unto Saul, to-morrow shalt thou and thy sons be with me, and R. Jochanan said: "With me, means in my abode." And the other Rabbis say from this [it is derived that God forgave his sin], (II Sam. 21, 6.) And we will hang them up unto the Lord in Gibas of Saul, the chosen of the Lord. i.e., A Bath Kol (heavenly voice) went forth and said "The chosen of the Lord."

Rabbi Shmuel bar Naḥmani interpreted the verses as referring to David: “The sons of Shela, son of Judah: Er, father of [avi] Lekha” (I Chronicles 4:21) – the President of the Court [Av Beit Din] of Lekha. “And Lada, father of [avi] Maresha” (I Chronicles 4:21) – the President of the Court [Av Beit Din] of Maresha. “And the families of the house of those who wrought fine linen,” – this is David, who was engaged [in preparing] the Tabernacle curtain.⁶⁴Which was woven from linen. David prepared various materials for the construction of the Temple. That is what is written: “Elḥanan [son of Yarei Oregim the Bethlehemite] slew [Goliath the Gitite]” (II Samuel 21:19) – this is David, to whom the Holy One blessed be He was gracious;⁶⁵Elḥanan may be interpreted as the two words El ḥanan, God was gracious. “son of Yarei” – a son who was growing up in the forest [ya’ar]; “Oregim,” as he was engaged [in preparing] the curtain.⁶⁶Oregim means weavers. Alternatively, “Oregim,” they would raise halakhot before him, and he would weave them.⁶⁷He would organize them coherently. Alternatively, these are the Sanhedrin, who would weave matters of Torah with him.
“To the house of Ashbea” (I Chronicles 4:21) – as the Holy One blessed be He took an oath [nishba] to him, as it is stated: “I took an oath to My chosen one” (Psalms 89:4). “And Yokim” (I Chronicles 4:22) – as He fulfilled [shekiyem] His oath to Him, as it is stated: “The Lord took an oath to David in truth, He will not renege on it” (Psalms 132:11). “And the people of Kozeva” (I Chronicles 4:22), Rabbi Azarya, Rabbi Yonatan, and Rabbi Yitzḥak bar Maryon, and some say, Rabbi Yosei ben Rabbi Ḥanina: The greater part of the Sanhedrin⁶⁸The court that distinguishes between truth and lies [kazav]. was from the tribe of Judah. What is the reason? It is as it is stated: “His eyes will be red with wine, and his teeth white with milk” (Genesis 49:12).⁶⁹This verse was stated by Jacob in his blessing to Judah. They would arrange the halakha with their teeth until they would express it with the clarity of milk.⁷⁰They would constantly review their studies aloud until they understood them with absolute clarity. “Yoash” (I Chronicles 4:22) – as he despaired [nitya’ash] of life, “please let Your hand be against me” (I Chronicles 21:17). “And Saraf” (I Chronicles 4:22), as he mentioned the act of those who were burned [serufim], “Lord, God of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, our fathers” (I Chronicles 29:18).⁷¹Abraham was thrown into a fiery furnace due to his belief in God and opposition to idolatry (Bereishit Rabba 38:13); Isaac allowed himself to be bound to the altar, assuming he would be slaughtered and burned; and, according to the Zohar, Jacob also was willing to die for the sake of God (Matnot Kehuna). “Who had dominion over Moav” (I Chronicles 4:22), as he emerged from Ruth the Moavite. “And Yashuvi Laḥem” (I Chronicles 4:22) – as he came from Bethlehem [Beit Leḥem] in Judah.
“And the matters are ancient” (I Chronicles 4:22) – Rabbi Aivu said: This is [a reference to] David and Solomon, who participated in the construction of the Temple before the Holy One blessed be He.⁷²God is also referred to as the Ancient One (Daniel 7:9). Rabbi Yehuda ben Rabbi Simon said: This is Benayahu ben Yehoyada, who exerted himself in participating with King Solomon in the construction of the Temple. Rabbi Yehuda said: This is Yehoyada the High Priest who, together with Yoash, tended to Temple upkeep. Rabbi Neḥemya says: This is Jeremiah and Ezekiel who prayed before the Holy One blessed be He not to destroy the Temple.
“They are the potters [yotzerim]” (I Chronicles 4:23) – these are Boaz and Ruth.⁷³The creators [yotzerim] of the royal house of David. “And the dwellers among the plants” (I Chronicles 4:23) – this is Solomon, who was [young] like a sapling when he reigned. “And a fence” (I Chronicles 4:23) – these are the Sanhedrin, who would build fences with him [Solomon] in matters of Torah. “They dwelt there with the king in his service” (I Chronicles 4:23) – from here they said: Ruth the Moavite died only after she saw her descendant Solomon judging the case of the prostitutes;⁷⁴I Kings 3:16–28. that is what is written: “He placed a throne for the king's mother” (I Kings 2:19) – this is Bathsheba; “and she sat on his right hand” (I Kings 2:19) – this is Ruth the Moavite.

The disciples of R. Jose questioned him: "How did David marry two sisters while they were both living?" He answered them: "He married Michal after the death of Merab." And R. Jose said so in accordance with his own theory, for we are taught in a Baraitha: R. Jose used to lecture about the following two confused passages: It is written (II Sam. 21, 8) And the king took the two sons of Rizpah, the daughters of Ayah, whom she had born unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal, the daughler of Saul, whom she had borne to Adriel, the son of Barzillai the Mehollathite. But was Michal given to Adriel? Was she not given to Palti b. Layish? as it is written (Ib. 25, 44) But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife, to Palti, the son of Layish. Hence the Scriptures equalize the betrothing of Merab to Adriel to the betrothing of Michal to Palti b. Layish. Just as the betrothing of Michal to Palti was a sin because she was already the wife of David, so also was the betrothing of Herab to Adriel a sin because she was already David's wife. But what would R. Joshua b. Karcha say to the passage which reads: The five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul? Did then, Michal hear them? Was it not Merab who bore them? R. Joshua will answer that Merab bore them and Michal merely brought them up, and therefore they bore the name of Michal. This is to teach you that the one who brings up an orphan is considered by Scriptures as if he bore the child. R. Chanina says: "This is inferred from (Ruth 4, 17) There hath been a son born unto Naomi, etc. Did, then, Naomi bear him? Was it not, in fact, Ruth who bore him? Therefore we must say that, though Ruth bore him, he was nevertheless brought up by Naomi, and therefore is he called after her." R. Jochanan said: "From the following (I Chr. 4, 18) And his wife the Jewess bore Jered the father of Gedor, and Heber the father, etc., and these are the sons of Bithiah, the daughter of Pharaoh, whom Mered had taken [for wife]. Mered refers to Caleb, and why was he called Mered (rebel)? Because he rebelled against the accusation of the spies. And was he then born of Bithiah? Behold he was born of Jochcbed? We must therefore say that, though he was born of Jochebed, he was nevertheless raised by Bithiah, and therefore he is called after her name." R. Eliezer said: From the following (Ps. 77, 16) Thou hast with Thine arm redeemed Thy people, the sons of Jacob and Joseph. Selah, Were they, then, born to Joseph, and not to Jacob? They were born to Jacob, but Joseph fed them, and therefore they were named after him.

.

“They raised their voices, and wept again. Orpa kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth cleaved to her” (Ruth 1:14).
“They raised [vatisena] their voices, and wept.” [The word vatisena appears in this verse] without an alef [indicating that] their strength was weakened,¹¹⁸The word is missing a letter to allude to the fact that their strength became lacking. as they were walking and weeping. Rabbi Berekhya in the name of Rabbi Yitzḥak: Orpa walked forty paces with her mother-in-law [before leaving], and [therefore] her descendant’s [sentence] was in abeyance for forty days, as it is stated: “The Philistine approached morning and evening [and stood for forty days]” (I Samuel 17:16).¹¹⁹The midrash claims that the Philistine warrior Goliath was a descendant of Orpa. He challenged the Israelites for forty days until David confronted him and killed him. Rabbi Yudan in the name of Rabbi Yitzḥak: Orpa walked four mil with her mother-in-law, and four mighty men came from her, as it is stated: “These four were born to the giant [harafa]”¹²⁰An allusion to Orpa. (II Samuel 21:22). Rabbi Yitzḥak said: Throughout that night that Orpa took her leave from her mother-in-law, the nakedness of one hundred gentiles was intermingled with her; that is what is written: “He spoke with them…from the ranks [mima’arkhot] of the Philistines” (I Samuel 17:23) – mime’arot is written; from one hundred foreskins [me’a orlot] of gentiles that were inserted into her throughout the night. Rabbi Tanḥuma said: One dog, too, as it is written: “The Philistine said to David: Am I a dog?” (I Samuel 17:43).

(Fol. 63a) Rabina, while sitting before R. Ashi observed a man tying an ass to a tree on the Sabbath. Rabina admonished the man but the latter paid no attention to him, whereupon Rabina said: "Thou art under ban for this." Rabina then said to R. Ashi: "Can this action of mine be regarded as disgraceful?" [Because I have done it in the presence of you, my teacher.] R. Ashi answered: "There us no wisdom nor understanding nor counsel against the Lord (Pr. 21, 30), i.e., whenever the desecration of the name of the Lord is threatened, no regard must be paid to a teacher." Raba said: "In the presence of his teacher, it is prohibited [for a disciple to decide a legal question] and it involves capital punishment; but in the absence of his teacher [if a disciple does so] it is, of course, prohibited but no capital punishment is involved." And in the absence of his teacher, you say, it does not involve capital punishment. Behold! It is taught that R. Elazar says: "The sons of Aaron did not die for any other sin than that they decided questions of law in the presence of their teacher, Moses. What verse did they interpret? [without asking Moses their teacher:] And the sons of Aaron the priest, shall put fire upon the latter (Lev. 1, 7). Thus they said to themselves: 'Although fire is to descend from heaven [upon the altar], it is nevertheless, a virtuous act to bring common fire.'" There was a disciple of R. Elazar. who decided legal questions in the presence of the latter. Whereupon R. Elazar said unto Ema Salmon, his wife: "I wonder if this disciple will live through this year." And the disciple died within that year. So his wife said to R. Elazar: "Art thou a prophet?" "Neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet," was his answer, "but I have a tradition that whoever decides a legal question in the presence of his teacher is guilty of capital punishment." And Rabba b. Chana said that this disciple was Juda b. Guriah and he was three miles away from his teacher, R. Elazar. [Hence it shows that even in the absence of his teacher, deciding legal questions involves capital punishment.'] It was in his teacher's presence. But R. Jachanan said he was three miles away from his teacher! And according to your own opinion [is there not an objection to be raised]? Wherefore was it necessary to state the disciple's name and his father's name? We must say (that these names are given) that we should not construe the above story as a mere parable. [Therefore it stated all the facts and it was indeed decided in the presence of R. Elazar.] R. Chiya b. Abba, in the name of R. Jochanan, said: "Whoever decides a legal question in the presence of his teacher, deserves to be bitten by a serpent, for it is said (Job 32, 6.) And Elihu, the son of Barachel, the Buzite, commenced, and said: 'Young am I in days, and ye are very old; therefore I hesitated and feared to show you what I Icnoiv.' It is written here vachalei (I feared). and it is written there (Deu. 32. 24.) With the power of serpents (Zochalei) that crawl in the dust." R. Zera said in the name of R. Chanina: "He is to be called sinner, as it is said (Ps. 119, 11.) In my heart have I treasured up thy saying, in order that I may not sin against thee." R. Humnuna raised the following contradictory point: "It is written (Ib.) In my heart, have I treasured up thy saying, and it is written (Ib. 40, 10.) I announce Thy righteousness in the great assembly"; and he himself explained it: "The former was said when Ira, the Yairite [his teacher], was living, [therefore David did not teach others]; and the latter refers to the time when Ira, the Yairite, was dead." R. Abba b. Zabda said: "He who sends his [priestly] gifts unto one priest will bring a famine into the world, for it is said (II Sam. 20, 26.) and Ira, the Yairite, was a priest unto David, etc. Was he a priest unto David only? Behold he was a priest unto all Israel also! We must therefore say that it means 'All the priestly gifts were given unto him by David, and immediately following this it is written (Ib. 21, 1.) And there was a famine for three years in the days of David." R. Elazar said: "He [who decides a legal question in the presence of his teacher] will be deposed from his honorable position, as it is said (Num. 31, 21.) And Elazar, the priest, said unto the men of the army," etc. And although he said that the law was taught to his uncle and not to him, still he was deposed from his honorable position, as it is written (Ib. 27, 28.) And before Elazar, the priest, shall he (Joshua) stand and he shall ask of him after the Judgment of the Urim before the Lord, etc. We, however, do not find an instance where Joshua ever availed himself of Elazar's help."

(Numb. 3:4:) “And they had no children.” R. Jacob bar Abin said in the name of R. Aha, “If they had had children, they would have taken precedence over Eleazar and Ithamar, since whoever takes precedence with respect to inheritance takes precedence with respect to honor, provided that he follows the behavior of his forebears.”⁵⁰PRK 26(27):10; Lev. R. 20:11; Numb. R. 2:26. (Ibid.:) “So Eleazar and Ithamar served as priests in the presence of ('al-pene) their father Aaron.” R. Isaac said, “During his lifetime”; but R. Hiyya bar Abba said, “At his death.” According to the opinion of R. Isaac, who said, “During his lifetime,” 'al-pene is mentioned here, and pene is also mentioned elsewhere (in Gen. 11:28), “And Haran died in the lifetime of ('al-pene) his father Terah.” If pene as used elsewhere (i.e., in Gen. 11:28) [means] during his lifetime, pene as used here (in Numb. 3:4) also [means] during his lifetime. According to the opinion of R. Hiyya bar Abba, who said, “At his death,” pene is used here (in Numb. 3:4) and pene is used elsewhere (in Gen. 23:3), “Then Abraham arose from beside ('al-pene) his dead (i.e., his dead wife).” If pene as used elsewhere (in Gen. 23:3) [means] at his death, pene as used here (in Numb. 3:4) also [means] at his death. Now according to the opinion of R. Isaac, who said, “during his lifetime,” [when] uncleanness befell Aaron, Eleazar ministered; [when] uncleanness befell Eleazar, Ithamar ministered. There is a story about Simeon ben Gimhit,⁵¹He was high priest in 17-18 C.E. that he went out to speak with the king of the Arabians.⁵²TYoma 4(3):20; yYoma 1:1 (38d); yMeg. 1:12(10) (72a); yHor. 3:3/5(2) (47d): Yoma 47a; ARN, A 35:4. When a streak of saliva squirted from [the king's] mouth onto his clothes and rendered him unclean, his brother Judah entered and ministered in the high priesthood in his place. That day Gimhit saw two of her sons as high priests. They said, “Gimhit had seven sons, and all of them ministered in the high priesthood.” The sages entered her home and said to her, “Tell us what good deeds you have to your credit?” She said to them, “By the Temple service, the rafters of my house have never seen the hair of my head.” They say, “All flours (qimhayya) are flour (qimhin), but the flour of Gimhit is fine flour.” In reference to her they read this verse (Ps. 45:14), “All glorious is the king's daughter within; her clothing is of gold brocade.” Now according to the opinion of R. Hiyya bar Abba, who said, “At his death,” when Aaron died, Eleazar ministered; when Eleazar died, Ithamar served in his place. R. Abba bar Abbina said, “For what reason is the parashah [about the death of] of Miriam (Numb. 20:1) near the parashah of the ashes of the [red] heifer (Numb. 19:1ff.)?⁵³PRK 26(27):11; Lev. R. 20:12; yYoma 1:1 (38b); MQ 28a. Simply to teach that just as the ashes of the [red] heifer atones, so does the death of the righteous atone.” R. Judan said, “For what reason is the death of Aaron (Deut. 10:6) near the breaking of the tablets (Deut. 9:17)? To teach that the death of the righteous is as grievous to the Holy One, blessed be He, as the breaking of the tablets.” R. Hiyya bar Abba said, “The sons of Aaron died on the first of Nisan.⁵⁴According to Lev. 10:1, they died at the time of the dedication of the Tabernacle; and according to Exod. 40:17, the dedication began with its erection on the first day of the first month, i.e., on the first of Abib, which came to be called Nisan. For what reason does it mention their death on the Day of Atonement (in Lev. 16:1)? It is simply to teach that, just as the Day of Atonement atones, so does the death of the righteous atone.” And where is it shown that the Day of Atonement atones? Where it is stated (in Lev. 16:30), “For on this day atonement shall be made for you to cleanse you.” And where it is shown that the death of the righteous atones? Where it is stated (in II Sam. 21:14), “Then they buried the bones of Saul […] and God responded to the plea of the land thereafter.”

Another interpretation (of Gen. 28:10): BUT JACOB SET OUT. This is one of four children of Adam for whom the land (i.e., spatial distance) was contracted. They are the following: Abraham, Eleazer, Jacob, and Abishai.²³Cf. Sanh. 95 (bar.), which omits Abraham from the list. In the case of Abraham, where is it shown? < It was > when he went forth to pursue the kings < that > the land contracted before him. Thus it is stated (in Gen. 14:15): AND THE NIGHT WAS DIVIDED AGAINST THEM.²⁴I.e., Abraham only needed to pursue the kings until midnight because God had shortened the pursuit. So Gen. R. 43:3; Exod. R. 18:1; cf. Gen. R. 43:3. And in the case of Eleazer, where is it shown? < It was > when he went to bring a wife for Isaac < that > the land contracted before him.²⁵Sanh. 95a; PRE 16. What is written about him (in Gen. 24:42)? AND I CAME TODAY (i.e., in one day) TO THE SPRING. The day he set out was the very day on which he arrived. And in the case of Abishai, where is it shown? When he fought with Ishbi-benob the brother of Goliath.²⁶See also Gen. R. 59:11. What did he do? He went after David with his shield at the ready. In that hour the Holy One put the fear of David upon him, since he said: How swift this man is! Where are David and his mighty men? And where is it shown? Where it is so written (in II Sam. 21:15): AND DAVID WAS WEARY. At that time David had said: Oh, that someone would put one of my sister's sons here for me. Now Joab and Abishai were far away from him where they were fighting with the children of Ammon and with Aram (cf. I Chron. 19:10f.) However, when David prayed, the Holy One contracted the land before Abishai, as stated (in II Sam. 21:17): BUT ABISHAI BEN ZERUIAH CAME TO HIS AID. And our father Jacob was also one before whom the Holy One caused the land to contract.²⁷Sanh. 95b; Gen. R. 68:8. Thus it is stated (in Gen. 28:10; 29:1): AND JACOB SET OUT FROM BEERSHEBA AND WENT TO HARAN…. [THEN JACOB CONTINUED HIS JOURNEY (literally: RAISED HIS FEET)]. Our masters have said: In the case of all the children of Adam, their feet carry them; but in Jacob's case, he keeps his feet up. Thus it is stated (in Gen. 29:1): THEN JACOB RAISED HIS FEET.

Another interpretation (of Gen. 28:10): BUT JACOB SET OUT. This is one of four children of Adam for whom the land (i.e., spatial distance) was contracted. They are the following: Abraham, Eleazer, Jacob, and Abishai.²³Cf. Sanh. 95 (bar.), which omits Abraham from the list. In the case of Abraham, where is it shown? < It was > when he went forth to pursue the kings < that > the land contracted before him. Thus it is stated (in Gen. 14:15): AND THE NIGHT WAS DIVIDED AGAINST THEM.²⁴I.e., Abraham only needed to pursue the kings until midnight because God had shortened the pursuit. So Gen. R. 43:3; Exod. R. 18:1; cf. Gen. R. 43:3. And in the case of Eleazer, where is it shown? < It was > when he went to bring a wife for Isaac < that > the land contracted before him.²⁵Sanh. 95a; PRE 16. What is written about him (in Gen. 24:42)? AND I CAME TODAY (i.e., in one day) TO THE SPRING. The day he set out was the very day on which he arrived. And in the case of Abishai, where is it shown? When he fought with Ishbi-benob the brother of Goliath.²⁶See also Gen. R. 59:11. What did he do? He went after David with his shield at the ready. In that hour the Holy One put the fear of David upon him, since he said: How swift this man is! Where are David and his mighty men? And where is it shown? Where it is so written (in II Sam. 21:15): AND DAVID WAS WEARY. At that time David had said: Oh, that someone would put one of my sister's sons here for me. Now Joab and Abishai were far away from him where they were fighting with the children of Ammon and with Aram (cf. I Chron. 19:10f.) However, when David prayed, the Holy One contracted the land before Abishai, as stated (in II Sam. 21:17): BUT ABISHAI BEN ZERUIAH CAME TO HIS AID. And our father Jacob was also one before whom the Holy One caused the land to contract.²⁷Sanh. 95b; Gen. R. 68:8. Thus it is stated (in Gen. 28:10; 29:1): AND JACOB SET OUT FROM BEERSHEBA AND WENT TO HARAN…. [THEN JACOB CONTINUED HIS JOURNEY (literally: RAISED HIS FEET)]. Our masters have said: In the case of all the children of Adam, their feet carry them; but in Jacob's case, he keeps his feet up. Thus it is stated (in Gen. 29:1): THEN JACOB RAISED HIS FEET.

(Gen. 44:18:) AND < JUDAH > SAID: PRAY, MY LORD…. FOR YOUR SERVANT HAS BECOME SURETY FOR THE LAD. When did Judah discharge his surety? In the days of Goliath. At that time, when Israel was in trouble, what is written (in I Sam. 17:16)? THEN THE PHILISTINE DREW NEAR AT DAWN AND IN THE EVENING. < He was > cursing and reviling. Saul began sending out a herald < to proclaim > (as implied in I Sam. 17:25): AND IT SHALL COME TO PASS FOR THE MAN WHO KILLS HIM THAT THE KING SHALL ENRICH HIM < WITH GREAT RICHES >…. Now you find that anyone who curses is liable for death, as stated (in Lev. 24:16): AND THE ONE WHO BLASPHEMES THE NAME OF THE LORD SHALL SURELY BE PUT TO DEATH … but that wicked man had been cursing (according to I Sam. 17:16): FOR FORTY DAYS. Moses said (in Deut. 7:10): AND < GOD > INSTANTLY REPAYS THOSE WHO HATE HIM WITH DESTRUCTION. In the case of someone wicked who performs a righteous act, the Holy One renders it unfit < by giving him his reward > during his life in this world in order to destroy him in the world to come; but for the righteous, he sets aside their righteous acts for the world to come.²²M. Pss.94:4. What < righteous act > did this wicked man (i.e., Goliath) do for him to curse for forty days? R. Isaac and R. Levi differ.²³Ruth R. 2:20. R. Levi said: Because his mother, Orpah ('RPH), walked four miles²⁴Lat.: mille. with her mother-in-law (cf. Ruth 1:7, 14), [the Holy One repaid her for it]. So from her the Holy One raised four heroes. Thus it is stated (in II Sam. 21:22): THESE FOUR WERE BORN TO THE GIANT (HRPH) OF GATH.²⁵According to vss. 15-20, the four heroes were Ishbi-benob, Saph, Goliath, and a fourth man with twelve fingers and twelve toes. R. Isaac said: She walked forty paces²⁶Lat.: passus. with her; therefore, the Holy One granted her her reward and gave her Goliath.²⁷Ruth R. 2:20 states more specifically that in return for her forty paces the Holy One granted her son a forty-day reprieve. So he was cursing before the Holy One forty days, as stated (in I Sam. 17:16): AND HE (the Philistine) TOOK HIS STAND FOR FORTY DAYS. Jesse said to his son David: Now is the time to make good on the surety of your ancestor who became surety for Benjamin under the hand of his father, as stated (in Gen. 43:9): I MYSELF WILL BE SURETY FOR HIM. Now go and discharge him from his surety. Thus it is stated (in I Sam. 17:18): SEE ALSO TO THE WELFARE OF YOUR BROTHERS, AND TAKE THEIR TOKEN. Now THEIR TOKEN ('RBH) is nothing but a surety ('RBWT). What did David do? He went and made good on the surety by killing Goliath. The Holy One said to him: By your life, just as you have risked your life for Saul, since he is from the tribe of Benjamin, even as your ancestor Judah did for Benjamin < himself >, as stated (in Gen. 44:33): AND NOW PLEASE LET YOUR SERVANT REMAIN AS A SLAVE TO MY LORD INSTEAD OF THE LAD … so I am placing the Sanctuary < both > within your territory and within the territory of Benjamin. And where is it shown that the Sanctuary is < both > within the inheritance of Benjamin and within the inheritance of Judah? Where one text (Gen. 49:27) says: BENJAMIN IS A RAVENOUS WOLF; IN THE MORNING HE CONSUMES PREY, i.e., the dawn tamid (sacrifice), AND IN THE EVENING HE DIVIDES THE SPOIL, i.e., the twilight tamid; while another text (Ps. 48:3 [2]) says: BEAUTEOUS LANDSCAPE, JOY OF THE WHOLE EARTH, < EVEN MOUNT ZION >. By your life, moreover, when all the tribes are going into exile, the tribes of Judah and Benjamin are not going into exile along with them. Why? Because these two tribes believed in me and sanctified my name in the sea with Moses. R. Abba bar Kahana said in the name of R. Levi: When the sea was split open for Israel, there was mire in it. Now the tribe of Reuben said to the tribe of Simeon: From mud you have come and to mud you are going. Thus it is stated (in Hos. 12:1): EPHRAIM SURROUNDS ME WITH DECEIT, THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL WITH FALSE-HOOD…. What did the tribes of Judah and Benjamin do? They sanctified the name of the Holy One, as stated (in Ps. 68:28 [27]): LITTLE BENJAMIN IS THERE RULING OVER THEM, THE PRINCES OF JUDAH IN THEIR GLORY….

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

(II Sam. 21) And they all fell in the hand of David and his servants. (Ruth 1, 14) And Orpa kissed her mother-in-law; but Ruth cleaved unto her. To whom does this refer? To the following passage said R. Isaac: "The Holy One, praised be He, said, 'Let the children of the one who kissed her, fall in to the hand of the one who cleaved unto her.'" Raba expounded: "As a reward for the four tears which Orpa shed over her mother-in-law, she was rewarded that the four giants were descended from her." The four tears are referred to in the following passage (Ib., ib.,14) And they lifted up their voices and wept a long time.

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

... “And David went and he took the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son from the men of Jabesh- gilead… And he brought up from there the bones of Saul and the bones of Jonathan his son…” (Shmuel II 21:12-13) What did David do? He went and gathered all the elders and great ones of Israel, crossed the Jordan River, and came to Yavesh-gilead. He found the bones of Shaul and his son Yonatan, placed them in a casket and crossed back over the Jordan, as it says “And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father and they did all that the king commanded…” (Shmuel II 21:14) What does ‘in Zela, in the tomb of Kish his father’ mean? It comes to teach us that they brought them to the border of Jerusalem and buried them there. Zela is next to Jerusalem, as it says “And Zelah, Eleph, and the Jebusite, which is Jerusalem…” (Yehoshua 18:28) ‘and they did all that the king commanded’ And what did the king command? He commanded that they carry Shaul’s casket from tribe to tribe. As Shaul’s casket entered each tribe’s territory all the men, women and children came out in order to perform an act of loving kindness to Shaul and his sons and thereby all of Israel would fulfill its obligation to loving kindness. This went on until they reached the land of his portion on the border of Jerusalem. Since the Holy One saw that they did loving kindness to Shaul and fulfilled the judgement of the Givonites He was immediately filled with mercy and sent rain upon the land, as it says “And God was entreated for the land after that.” (Shmuel II 21:14) From this we learn how close the Holy One brings those that are far away, even though they converted not for the sake of heaven. There is no need to even mention how he draws near righteous converts, “O Lord, all the kings of the earth will acknowledge You…” (Tehillim 138:4)

R. Chana b. Adda said: "The decree concerning the Gibeonites was issued by David, as it is said (II Sam. 21, 2) And the king called for the Gibeonites and said unto them: now the Gibeonites are not of the children of Israel." Why did David make such a decree against them? Because, as it is written And then was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year. During the first year of the famine, David said to Israel: "Perhaps there are odilaters amongst ye, concerning which it is written (Deut. 11, 16) And ye turn aside and serve other gods, and worship them. Then the Lord's wrath will be kindled against you, and He will shut up the heavens that there be no rain." They investigated and found nothing of the kind. During the second year [of the famine] ( he again said to them: "Perhaps there are amongst you adulterers, concerning whom it is written (Jer. 3, 3) And [though] the early showers were with-holden, and the later rain came not, yet hadst thou a forehead of incestuous wife." Thereupon they investigated, but again found nothing of the kind. Upon the third year of the famine, David said to Israel: "Perhaps there are amongst you such that subscribed to charity in public and refused to pay, concerning which it is written (Pr. 25, 14) Like clouds and wind without rain, so is man that vaunteth falsely of a gift." They investigated and again did not find any trace of it. David then said: "The cause hangs upon none else but myself." Immediately (II Sam. 21, 1) and David besought the presence of the Lord. What does this mean? Resh Lakish said: "He asked information through the Urim and the Tummim." What is the intimation for it? Said R. Elazar: "We infer through the [analogy of expression] of the word R'nei, P'nei. It is written here (Ib.) And David besought the presence (P'nei) of the Lord, and it is written there (Num 27, 21) and he shall ask of him after the Judgment of the Urim before (Li-phnei) the Lord." (II Sam. 21, 1) And the Lord said, On account of Saul, and on account of the house of blood is this; because he hath slain the Gibeonites; i.e., on account of Saul, that he was not eulogized properly; and on account of the house of blood, because he hath slain the Gibeonites. Where do we find that Saul had slain the Gibeonites? We must therefore say that because he had slain the inhabitants of Nob, the city of the priests, who supported the Gibeonites with water and food [thus cutting off their support,] Scripture considers it as if he had actually slain them." Because Saul was not eulogized properly [Saul's honor,] and at the same time He demands because he had slain the Gibeonites [hence Saul's destruction?] Indeed so; for Resh Lakish said: "What is the meaning of the passage (Zeph. 2, 3) Seek ye the Lord, all ye meek of the earth, who have fulfilled His ordinances; i.e., in the same place where one is judged for his [bad actions,] also his [good deeds] are recorded. David then said: "As to Saul's grievances twelve months have already elapsed (Fol. 69) and it is not customary to make a funeral address any longer. But concerning the Gibeonites, let us call them and try to appease them." (II Sam. 21, 2-6) And the king called for the Gibeonite, and said unto them, etc. What shall I do for you? and wherewith shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord? And the Gibeonites said unto him: We have no concern of silver or gold with Saul and with his house, nor do we wish, etc. Let there be delivered unto us seven men of his sons, and we will hang them up unto the Lord. David tried to appease them [with any other thing but that:] however, they were not conciliated. David then said: "This nation (Israel) is recognized by three characteristic features, they are merciful, chaste and charitable. Merciful, as it is written (Deut. 13, 18) and grant thee mercy, and have mercy upon them and multiply thee; chaste, as it is written (Ex. 20, 20) and in order that His fear may be before your faces; charitable, as it is written (Gen. 18, 19) that he will command his children and his household, etc., with whomsoever possesses these characteristic features it is befitting to be associated, but with whomsoever posseses not these characteristic features it is not fitting to be associated."

R. Chana b. Adda said: "The decree concerning the Gibeonites was issued by David, as it is said (II Sam. 21, 2) And the king called for the Gibeonites and said unto them: now the Gibeonites are not of the children of Israel." Why did David make such a decree against them? Because, as it is written And then was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year. During the first year of the famine, David said to Israel: "Perhaps there are odilaters amongst ye, concerning which it is written (Deut. 11, 16) And ye turn aside and serve other gods, and worship them. Then the Lord's wrath will be kindled against you, and He will shut up the heavens that there be no rain." They investigated and found nothing of the kind. During the second year [of the famine] ( he again said to them: "Perhaps there are amongst you adulterers, concerning whom it is written (Jer. 3, 3) And [though] the early showers were with-holden, and the later rain came not, yet hadst thou a forehead of incestuous wife." Thereupon they investigated, but again found nothing of the kind. Upon the third year of the famine, David said to Israel: "Perhaps there are amongst you such that subscribed to charity in public and refused to pay, concerning which it is written (Pr. 25, 14) Like clouds and wind without rain, so is man that vaunteth falsely of a gift." They investigated and again did not find any trace of it. David then said: "The cause hangs upon none else but myself." Immediately (II Sam. 21, 1) and David besought the presence of the Lord. What does this mean? Resh Lakish said: "He asked information through the Urim and the Tummim." What is the intimation for it? Said R. Elazar: "We infer through the [analogy of expression] of the word R'nei, P'nei. It is written here (Ib.) And David besought the presence (P'nei) of the Lord, and it is written there (Num 27, 21) and he shall ask of him after the Judgment of the Urim before (Li-phnei) the Lord." (II Sam. 21, 1) And the Lord said, On account of Saul, and on account of the house of blood is this; because he hath slain the Gibeonites; i.e., on account of Saul, that he was not eulogized properly; and on account of the house of blood, because he hath slain the Gibeonites. Where do we find that Saul had slain the Gibeonites? We must therefore say that because he had slain the inhabitants of Nob, the city of the priests, who supported the Gibeonites with water and food [thus cutting off their support,] Scripture considers it as if he had actually slain them." Because Saul was not eulogized properly [Saul's honor,] and at the same time He demands because he had slain the Gibeonites [hence Saul's destruction?] Indeed so; for Resh Lakish said: "What is the meaning of the passage (Zeph. 2, 3) Seek ye the Lord, all ye meek of the earth, who have fulfilled His ordinances; i.e., in the same place where one is judged for his [bad actions,] also his [good deeds] are recorded. David then said: "As to Saul's grievances twelve months have already elapsed (Fol. 69) and it is not customary to make a funeral address any longer. But concerning the Gibeonites, let us call them and try to appease them." (II Sam. 21, 2-6) And the king called for the Gibeonite, and said unto them, etc. What shall I do for you? and wherewith shall I make the atonement, that ye may bless the inheritance of the Lord? And the Gibeonites said unto him: We have no concern of silver or gold with Saul and with his house, nor do we wish, etc. Let there be delivered unto us seven men of his sons, and we will hang them up unto the Lord. David tried to appease them [with any other thing but that:] however, they were not conciliated. David then said: "This nation (Israel) is recognized by three characteristic features, they are merciful, chaste and charitable. Merciful, as it is written (Deut. 13, 18) and grant thee mercy, and have mercy upon them and multiply thee; chaste, as it is written (Ex. 20, 20) and in order that His fear may be before your faces; charitable, as it is written (Gen. 18, 19) that he will command his children and his household, etc., with whomsoever possesses these characteristic features it is befitting to be associated, but with whomsoever posseses not these characteristic features it is not fitting to be associated."

(II Sam. 21, 8) And the king took the two sons of Riz-Pah the daughter of Ayah, whom she had born unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she had brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Mecholatithe. Why just these? R. Huna said: "They were passed by the Holy ark. Whomever the holy ark received was to die, and whomever the holy ark did not receive was to live." R. Huna b. Ketina raised the following objection (Ib., ib., 7) But the king had pity on Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan the son of Saul. [Hence it was decided by David and not by the Holy ark?] This means that David did not pass him by [before the Holy ark.] Can there then be favoritism used in such a case? We must therefore explain the above that Mephibosheth was led by the Holy ark and was also receieved, but David prayed and he was relieved. But again the question remained: Can there then be favoritism used in such a case? You must therefore explain it that David prayed that the ark should not receive him [and thus he had mercy.]

But behold it is written (Deut. 24, 26) Fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall children be put to death for the fathers? R. Chiya b. Abba said in the name of R. Jochanan: "Rather let one word of the Torah become impotent, than have the Heavenly name publicly profaned." (II Sam. 21, 10) And Rizpah the daughter of Ayah took sack cloth, and spread it out for herself upon the rock, from the beginning of the harvest until water dropped down upon them out of heaven, and she suffered neither the birds of heaven to rest on them by day, nor the beasts of the field by night. Behold it is written (Deut. 21, 23) Then shall his body not remain all night on the tree. R. Jochanan in the name of R. Simon b. Jehozadak said: "It is worth while that one letter of the Torah become impotent, if only the Heavenly name should [through it] be sanctified publicly: [for, whoever passed by the corpse] asked: 'What is the nature of these? Are they not princes, and what [crime] have they committed?' Because they had raised their hands against self-made converts (not formally admitted),' [the reasons were given.] The inquirers then would remark: 'There is no other nation that is more fitting to be associated with than this (Israel); for, if to princes they gave such punishment how much more so to an ordinary man; and if they so protect self-made converts, how much more so will they protect real Israelites (duly admitted proselytes)?' The result therefrom was that Israel was increased by one hundred and fifty thousand [proselytes], as it is said (I King 5, 29) And there belonged to Solomon seventy thousand bearers of burdens, and eighty thousand stone cutters in the mountains." But perhaps these were Israelties? You cannot possibly think so, for it is written (Ib. 9, 22) Yet of the children of Israel did Solomon make no one a servant. But perhaps the above were merely salaried employees? We must therefore say that the above is inferred from here (II Chr. 2, 16) And Solomon numbered all the gerim (proselytes) that were in the land of Israel, etc., and they were found to be one hundred and fifty thousand. And he made of them seventy thousand bearers of burdens, etc. And was then the decree against the Gibeonites issued by David? Behold! Moses issued the decree, as it is written (Deut. 29, 10) from the hewer of the wood, etc. Moses merely decreed it for that generation, but David decreed it for all generations. Again has not Joshua decreed concerning them? For it is written (Josh. 9, 27) And Joshua appointed them only that day hewers of the wood, etc. Joshua's decree was only for the period during which the Temple existed, but David's decree was issued for the period beyond the destruction of the Temple.

R. Abba bar Abbina said: For what reason is the parashah on < the death of > Miriam (Numb. 20:1) near the parashah on the ashes of the < red > heifer (Numb. 19:1ff.)?⁵⁶Tanh., Lev. 6:7; PRK 26(27):11; Lev. R. 20:12; yYoma 1:1 (38b); MQ 28a. Simply to teach that just as the ashes of the < red > heifer atones, so does the death of the righteous atone. R. [Judan] said: For what reason is the death of Aaron (Deut. 10:6) near the breaking of the tablets (Deut. 9:17)? To teach that the death of the righteous is as grievous to the Holy One as the breaking of the tablets. R. Hiyya bar Abba said: The sons of Aaron died on the first of Nisan.⁵⁷According to Lev. 10:1, they died at the time of the dedication of the Tabernacle; and according to Exod. 40:17, the dedication began with its erection on the first day of the first month, i.e., on the first of Abib, which came to be called Nisan. Why does it mention their death on the Day of Atonement (in Lev. 16:1)? {He said to him:} [It is simply] to teach that, just as the Day of Atonement atones, so does the death of the righteous atone. And where is it shown that the Day of Atonement atones? Where it is stated (in Lev. 16:30): FOR ON THIS DAY ATONEMENT SHALL BE MADE FOR YOU TO CLEANSE YOU. And where it is shown that the death of the righteous atones? Where it is stated (in II Sam. 21:14): THEN THEY BURIED THE BONES OF SAUL…. AND GOD RESPONDED TO THE PLEA OF THE LAND THEREAFTER.

R. Jochanan said: "One who robs his neighbor even to the value of a parutha (half a cent) is considered as if he would take away his life; for it is said (Prov. 1, 19) So are the ways of every one who is greedy of [unlawful] gain; it takes away the life of the owners thereof. And again there is a verse (Jer. 5, 17) And they shall eat up thy harvest, and thy bread, they shall eat up thy sons and thy daughters. And again (Joel. 4, 19) For the violence against the children of Judah. And again (II. Sam. 21, 1) It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, because he put to death the Gibeonites. To what purpose is the second verse cited? One may say that it refers only to his own life, but not to the life of his children; hence the other verse, The flesh of thy sons and daughters. And still one may say that it refers only to a robber who does not pay for the robbery, but not if he does pay; hence the verse, For the violence against the children of Judah. [Violence means even when he gives money]. And, finally, one may say: This deals only when he actually did it with his hands, but not when he was only a cause of it; hence the last verse, Who has slain the Gibeonites; where do we find that Saul had slain them? We must say, therefore, that because he has slain Nob the city of the priests, who liad supported the Gibeonites with water and food, Scripture considers Saul as though he himself had slain the Gibeonites.

(II Sam. 21, 16) And Yishbi at Nob, who was of the children of the Raphah, the weight of whose spear was three hundred shekels of copper, being girded with new armour, thought to slay David. What does Yishbi at Nob mean? R. Juda, in the name of Rab, said: "A man [who came] because of that which was done to [the inhabitants of] Nob." The Holy One, praised be He! said to David: "How long will you keep in your hand this iniquity? Through thee came the destruction of Nob, the city of the priest. Through thee came the trouble upon Doeg the Edomite, and through thee Saul and his three sons were killed. Now dost thou want that I shall destroy thy children or that thou shouldst be delivered over to thy enemies?" And he answered: "Sovereign of the Universe! it is better for me to be delivered over to the enemy than that my descendants should be destroyed." Thereafter it happened one day that David went to a village and the Satan appeared to him in the form of a deer. He shot an arrow at it, which did not reach it. So he chased after it till he passed the border of the Philistines. And when Yishbi of Nob saw him, he said: "This is he who killed my brother Goliath." Whereupon the former seized and tied him and put him under the block of an olive press. However, a miracle occurred in that the earth under him became soft, and he was not killed. Concerning this it is written (Ps. 18, 37) Thou enlargest my steps under me, so that my joints do not slip. That day was the eve of Sabbath. And Abishai b. Zeruyah used to wash his head with four pitchers of water, when he noticed in it what appeared spots of blood; according to others, a dove came down and rolled before him in spasms. He said the assembly of Israel is likened unto a dove, as it is said (Ps. 68, 14) The wings of the dove covered with silver. Hence it must be that David the King of Israel was in trouble. He went to David's house but did not find him there. He sent to the house of study and he was not found there also. He then said: "We are taught: One must not ride on a king's horse, must not sit on his chair, etc. But how is it at the time of danger?" He went to the college and questioned concerning it. In answer he was told that at the time of danger it is permissible. Then he rode upon the king's mule and miraculously the earth (the road) was lessened (he was suddenly transferred to a distant place). And while riding he saw Arpa, Yishbi's mother, who sat and spun. As soon as she saw him she broke the thread [of her spindle] and threw it at him [with the intention of killing him]. Missing him, she said: "Young man, hand me my spindle." He took the spindle, threw it at her head, and killed her. When Yishbi of Nob saw Abishai, he said: "Now there are two, and they will be able to kill me." He seized David and tossed him up high, placing the point of his spear so that David should fall upon it, and be killed. But Abishai uttered the Tetragrammaton, causing David to remain suspending between the sky and the earth. (But why didn't David himself utter it? Because a prisoner cannot liberate himself from prison without help.) Abishai then questioned David as to what he was doing there. And he explained to him what the Omnipotent had told him and what his answer to it was. Abishai said to him: "Change thy prayer. Let thy grandson sell wax (be poor) so that thou be spared suffering (i.e., do not sacrifice the present for the sake of the future)." "If it must be so," said David, "then pray with me." This is meant by the passage (Sam. 30, 17) But Abishai the son of Zeruyah succored him. Upon which R. Juda, in the name of Rab, said that he prayed with him. Again Abishai uttered the Tetragrammaton and caused him to come down. Yishbi [seeing both fleeing] ran after them. When they reached the village of Kubi [situated] on the boundary of Palestine] they said to each other: "Let us stop here and fight him." [Nevertheless they went] as far as the village of Betrei and then they said: "Between [us] two cubs — can we kill the lion?" When the fight began they said to him: "Go back, and you will see that your mother is dead." As soon as they mentioned the name of his mother, his strength began to fail, whereupon they killed him. And this is meant by the passage (Ib. 17) Then swore the men of David unto him, saying: Thou shalt go out no more with us to battle, that thou mayest not quench the lamp of Israel.

(II Sam. 21, 16) And Yishbi at Nob, who was of the children of the Raphah, the weight of whose spear was three hundred shekels of copper, being girded with new armour, thought to slay David. What does Yishbi at Nob mean? R. Juda, in the name of Rab, said: "A man [who came] because of that which was done to [the inhabitants of] Nob." The Holy One, praised be He! said to David: "How long will you keep in your hand this iniquity? Through thee came the destruction of Nob, the city of the priest. Through thee came the trouble upon Doeg the Edomite, and through thee Saul and his three sons were killed. Now dost thou want that I shall destroy thy children or that thou shouldst be delivered over to thy enemies?" And he answered: "Sovereign of the Universe! it is better for me to be delivered over to the enemy than that my descendants should be destroyed." Thereafter it happened one day that David went to a village and the Satan appeared to him in the form of a deer. He shot an arrow at it, which did not reach it. So he chased after it till he passed the border of the Philistines. And when Yishbi of Nob saw him, he said: "This is he who killed my brother Goliath." Whereupon the former seized and tied him and put him under the block of an olive press. However, a miracle occurred in that the earth under him became soft, and he was not killed. Concerning this it is written (Ps. 18, 37) Thou enlargest my steps under me, so that my joints do not slip. That day was the eve of Sabbath. And Abishai b. Zeruyah used to wash his head with four pitchers of water, when he noticed in it what appeared spots of blood; according to others, a dove came down and rolled before him in spasms. He said the assembly of Israel is likened unto a dove, as it is said (Ps. 68, 14) The wings of the dove covered with silver. Hence it must be that David the King of Israel was in trouble. He went to David's house but did not find him there. He sent to the house of study and he was not found there also. He then said: "We are taught: One must not ride on a king's horse, must not sit on his chair, etc. But how is it at the time of danger?" He went to the college and questioned concerning it. In answer he was told that at the time of danger it is permissible. Then he rode upon the king's mule and miraculously the earth (the road) was lessened (he was suddenly transferred to a distant place). And while riding he saw Arpa, Yishbi's mother, who sat and spun. As soon as she saw him she broke the thread [of her spindle] and threw it at him [with the intention of killing him]. Missing him, she said: "Young man, hand me my spindle." He took the spindle, threw it at her head, and killed her. When Yishbi of Nob saw Abishai, he said: "Now there are two, and they will be able to kill me." He seized David and tossed him up high, placing the point of his spear so that David should fall upon it, and be killed. But Abishai uttered the Tetragrammaton, causing David to remain suspending between the sky and the earth. (But why didn't David himself utter it? Because a prisoner cannot liberate himself from prison without help.) Abishai then questioned David as to what he was doing there. And he explained to him what the Omnipotent had told him and what his answer to it was. Abishai said to him: "Change thy prayer. Let thy grandson sell wax (be poor) so that thou be spared suffering (i.e., do not sacrifice the present for the sake of the future)." "If it must be so," said David, "then pray with me." This is meant by the passage (Sam. 30, 17) But Abishai the son of Zeruyah succored him. Upon which R. Juda, in the name of Rab, said that he prayed with him. Again Abishai uttered the Tetragrammaton and caused him to come down. Yishbi [seeing both fleeing] ran after them. When they reached the village of Kubi [situated] on the boundary of Palestine] they said to each other: "Let us stop here and fight him." [Nevertheless they went] as far as the village of Betrei and then they said: "Between [us] two cubs — can we kill the lion?" When the fight began they said to him: "Go back, and you will see that your mother is dead." As soon as they mentioned the name of his mother, his strength began to fail, whereupon they killed him. And this is meant by the passage (Ib. 17) Then swore the men of David unto him, saying: Thou shalt go out no more with us to battle, that thou mayest not quench the lamp of Israel.

Rabbi Phineas said: Thirty years after Saul and his sons had been killed, a famine lasting three years arose in the days of David, year after year, as it is said, "And there was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year" (2 Sam. 21:1). Why was it year after year? In the first year all Israel went up to (celebrate the great) festivals. David said to them: Go and look if perchance there be among you some who worship idols, for because of the sin of idolatry rain is withheld, as it is said, "Take heed to yourselves, lest your heart be deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them" (Deut. 11:16). What is written after this? "And the anger of the Lord will be kindled against you, and he will shut up the heaven, that there be no rain" (Deut. 11:17). They went forth and investigated, but did not find (any idolatry).

David forthwith arose and gathered together all the elders of Israel and the nobles, and they crossed the Jordan. They came to Jabesh-Gilead and they found the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son. No worm had been able to touch them, as it is said, "He keepeth all his bones, not one of them is broken" (Ps. 34:20). They took the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son, and placed them in a coffin, and they crossed the Jordan, as it is said, "And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son… and they performed all that the king commanded" (2 Sam. 21:14). The king commanded that they should bring the coffin of Saul in all the borders of each tribe. And it came to pass that the tribe || wherein they brought the coffin of Saul, the people (there) with their wives and their sons and their daughters came forth and displayed loving-kindness to Saul and to his sons, so that all Israel should discharge their obligation of showing loving-kindness. And thus (did they do) until it came to the border of his possession to the border of Jerusalem, in the land of Benjamin in Jerusalem, as it is said, "And they buried the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son in the country of Benjamin" (ibid.), in the vicinity of Jerusalem. When the Holy One, blessed be He, saw that all Israel had displayed loving-kindness (to him), He was forthwith full of compassion, and He sent rain upon the land, as it is said, "And after that God was intreated for the land" (ibid.).

(Numb. 4:18) “Do not cut off.” See how well the text has said (in II Kings 14:27), “And the Lord did not resolve to blot out the name of Israel from under the heavens.” The Holy One, blessed be He, does not wish that anyone from Israel would die.¹²⁹Numb. R. 5:3. See what is written (in Is. 56:3), “And let not the foreigner who has attached himself to the Lord speak, saying, ‘The Lord will surely separate me from His people.’” Now if in the case of a foreigner I have promised not to reject him, how much the more so with My [own] children. Ergo (in II Kings 14:27), “the Lord did not resolve to blot out the name of Israel.” [And so it was with] the Gibeonites, who were not true proselytes, but were cursed proselytes in that they were proselytized out of fear. [Still] I accepted them. And when Saul wanted to harm them and killed some of them, I killed him.¹³⁰Lev. R. 22:5; Numb. R. 8:4; yQid. 4:1 (65c). And not only that, but I sent three years famine because of them, as stated (in II Sam. 21:1), “And there was a famine in the days of David for three years, one year after the other.” Now surely if I did not reject the Gibeonites who came to be with you, shall I reject My children? Ergo (in II Kings 14:27), “And the Lord did not resolve to blot out [the name of Israel from under the heavens].” And how much the more so in the case of the Levites, who minister before Me? Ergo (in Numb. 4:18), “Do not cut off [the tribe of the Kohathite families from the Levites].”

... one who kills a person/nefesh . . . it is as if he removed the icons of the king, and he is sentenced and has no life, for the human is created in the d’mut of the ministering angels

... one who kills a person/nefesh . . . it is as if he removed the icons of the king, and he is sentenced and has no life, for the human is created in the d’mut of the ministering angels

Another interpretation (of Numb. 4:18:) DO NOT CUT OFF. See how well the text has said (in II Kings 14:27): AND THE LORD DID NOT RESOLVE TO BLOT OUT [THE NAME OF] ISRAEL FROM UNDER THE HEAVENS. The Holy One does not wish that anyone from Israel would die.¹⁵³Tanh., Numb. 1:25; Numb. R. 5:3. See what is written (in Is. 56:3): AND LET NOT THE FOREIGNER WHO HAS ATTACHED HIMSELF TO THE LORD SPEAK, SAYING: THE LORD WILL SURELY SEPARATE ME FROM HIS PEOPLE. Now if in the case of a foreigner I have promised not to reject him, how much the more so with my <own> children. Ergo (in I Kings 14:27): THE LORD DID NOT RESOLVE TO BLOT OUT [THE NAME OF] ISRAEL. And so <it was with> the Gibeonites, who were not true proselytes but were forced proselytes¹⁵⁴Gerim gerurim, literally: “dragged-in proselytes.” See AZ 3b. [in that they were proselytized] out of fear. <Still> I accepted them. Moreover, when Saul wanted to harm them and killed some of them, I killed him.¹⁵⁵Lev. R. 22:5; Numb. R. 8:4; yQid. 4:1 (65c). And not only that, but I sent three years famine because of him, as stated (in II Sam. 21:1): AND THERE WAS A FAMINE IN THE DAYS OF DAVID FOR THREE YEARS. Now surely if I did not reject the Gibeonites who came to be with you, shall I reject my own children? Ergo (in II Kings 14:27): AND THE LORD DID NOT RESOLVE TO BLOT OUT [THE NAME OF ISRAEL FROM UNDER THE HEAVENS]. And how much the more so in the case of the Levites, who minister before me? Ergo (in Numb. 4:18): DO NOT CUT OFF <THE TRIBE OF THE KOHATHITE FAMILIES FROM THE LEVITES>.